Explorers or boys messing about? by Steven Morris is the Edexcel IGCSE persuasive newspaper article in which a Guardian reporter reframes the Antarctic rescue of two experienced British explorers as the antics of reckless wealthy schoolboys who landed the taxpayer with the bill. This guide gives you the paragraph-by-paragraph breakdown, 10 fully analysed quotes and a Grade 9 answer plan, complete and ready to reproduce in the exam.
Contents
- What is Explorers or boys messing about? about?
- What is the purpose of Explorers or boys messing about??
- What is the message of Explorers or boys messing about??
- What are the supporting issues and themes of Explorers or boys messing about??
- What happens in Explorers or boys messing about?? Paragraph-by-paragraph breakdown
- What are the 10 best quotes from Explorers or boys messing about??
- Vocabulary List
- What is the conclusion on Explorers or boys messing about??
- Frequently asked questions
What is Explorers or boys messing about? about?
Explorers or boys messing about? is a Guardian news article by Steven Morris.
It reports on two British explorers whose helicopter crashed off Antarctica.
A nine-hour rescue saved them, paid for by British and Chilean taxpayers.
Morris loads the report with bias to make the men look reckless.
He hides their real skill and uses class anger to win the reader.
This post breaks down each paragraph and shows how the bias is built.
What is the purpose of Explorers or boys messing about??
- Make the men look like reckless schoolboys, not skilled explorers
- Stir taxpayer anger at the cost of the rescue
- Borrow expert authority to question the men’s choices
- Bury the men’s real skill in the middle of the article
- Frame wealth as proof of foolish judgement
- Leave readers feeling united against the rich
What is the message of Explorers or boys messing about??
- Wealthy adventurers behave like irresponsible boys and should not cost the public money.
What are the supporting issues and themes of Explorers or boys messing about??
- Class resentment between the rich and ordinary taxpayers
- Bias and selective reporting in news writing
- Authority and expertise versus lived experience
- Childishness as a stamp put on adult men
- Structure as a tool to hide or highlight facts
- Public money and who has the right to use it
What happens in Explorers or boys messing about?? Paragraph-by-paragraph breakdown
Paragraph 1
- Headline frames the men as either explorers or naughty boys.
- Headline poses a question: explorers or boys messing about?
- Either way, taxpayer gets the rescue bill
- Article credited to Steven Morris
- Adapted from a piece in The Guardian newspaper
Paragraph 2
- Sub-headline summarises the rescue dramatically.
- Helicopter duo plucked from liferaft
- Plucked after an Antarctic crash
Paragraph 3
- Structure used to create a bad first impression by leading with their last failure.
- Their last expedition ended in farce
- Russians threatened to send in military planes
- Military planes would intercept them
- The men were trying to cross into Siberia
- They were crossing via the icebound Bering Strait
Paragraph 4
- Hyperbole and emotive language used to create drama from yesterday’s incident.
- Yesterday a new adventure was undertaken
- Names British explorers Steve Brooks and Quentin Smith
- The adventure almost led to tragedy
- Their helicopter plunged into the sea off Antarctica
Paragraph 5
- Listing of huge institutions used to exaggerate the inconvenience caused.
- The men were plucked from the icy water
- Plucked by a Chilean naval ship
- Rescue lasted nine hours
- Began when Mr Brooks contacted his wife Jo Vestey
- Used his satellite phone to ask for assistance
- Rescue involved the Royal Navy
- Rescue involved the RAF
- Rescue involved British coastguards
Paragraph 6
- Vague sources and manipulated statistics used to incite reader outrage.
- Last night there was resentment in some quarters
- Adventure had cost taxpayers tens of thousands of pounds
- Cost was to taxpayers of Britain and Chile
- Tens of thousands works out at one quarter of a penny each
Paragraph 7
- Expert opinion used to question the men’s judgement and experience.
- Experts questioned the wisdom of using a small helicopter
- The helicopter was a four-seater Robinson R44
- The R44 has a single engine
- Used in such a hostile environment
- Single expert quoted against two highly experienced men
Paragraph 8
- Claim that the men did not even know what they were trying to achieve.
- Confusion about what the men were trying to achieve
- A website promoted the Bering Strait expedition
- Site claimed the team would fly from north to south pole
- They would fly in their trusty helicopter
- Implies the website was outdated, so the men are bad explorers
Paragraph 9
- Wife’s joke used against the men and turned into the article’s theme.
- Ms Vestey claimed she did not know their plans
- Described them as boys messing about with a helicopter
- Wife unwittingly fed the writer his angle
Paragraph 10
- Emotive verbs used to intensify the sense of desperation.
- Drama began at around 1 am British time
- Mr Brooks was 42 years old
- Mr Smith was 40 years old, also known as Q
- They ditched into the sea 100 miles off Antarctica
- About 36 miles north of Smith Island
- Scrambled into their liferaft
Paragraph 11
- Husband’s call quoted to imply unawareness of the rescue process.
- Mr Brooks called his wife in London
- Used his satellite phone
- Quoted the wife: he said they were both in the life raft
- But were okay
- Asked her to call the emergency people
Paragraph 12
- Naming of the expensive watch used to stir socialist resentment.
- Distress signals were beamed from the ditched helicopter
- Signals also came from Mr Brooks’s Breitling emergency watch
- Watch was a wedding present
- Brand name dropped to flag wealth to socialist readers
Paragraph 13
- Listing of further rescue services adds to the inconvenience picture.
- Signals from the aircraft were deciphered
- Deciphered by Falmouth coastguard
- Passed on to the rescue coordination centre
- Centre was at RAF Kinloss in Scotland
Paragraph 14
- Emotive language used to imply urgency and chaos at sea.
- The Royal Navy ice patrol ship HMS Endurance was 180 miles away
- Endurance was surveying uncharted waters
- Began steaming towards the scene
- Dispatched its two Lynx helicopters
Paragraph 15
- Selective detail creates the false impression of bad weather at the crash.
- One Lynx was driven back because of poor visibility
- The second was on its way to the men
- The men were picked up by a Chilean naval vessel
- Picked up at about 10.20am British time
- Implies even military pilots could not fly the conditions
Paragraph 16
- Contradiction used to imply the men were saved only by miracle.
- The pair wore survival suits
- Weather at the spot where they ditched was clear
- An Antarctic explorer told Mr Brooks’s wife
- Said it was nothing short of a miracle that they had survived
- Despite all the precautions and good weather just listed
Paragraph 17
- The men’s experience is buried in the middle of the article.
- Both men are experienced adventurers
- Mr Brooks is a property developer from London
- Has taken part in expeditions to 70 countries
- Done so in 15 years
- Trekked solo to Everest base camp
- Walked barefoot for three days in the Himalayas
- Negotiated the white water rapids of the Zambezi by kayak
- Survived a charge by a silverback gorilla in the Congo
- Qualified mechanical engineer
- Qualified pilot
- Spent honeymoon flying the helicopter from Alaska to Chile
- That trip was 16,000 miles, took three months
- Mr Smith claims to have flown since age five
- Twice flown a helicopter around the globe
- Won the world freestyle helicopter flying championship
Paragraph 18
- Returns to the Russian incident to reinforce a narrative of failure.
- Not their first appearance in the headlines for wrong reasons
- April: Brooks and Graham Stratford were poised to cross the strait
- Bering Strait is 56 miles wide and frozen
- Lies between the US and Russia
- They would use Snowbird VI, an amphibious vehicle
- Snowbird could carve through ice floes and float
- Russian authorities forced them to call a halt
- Russians said they would scramble military helicopters
- Helicopters would lift them off the ice if they crossed
- Ironically, the expedition aimed to demonstrate good east-west relations
- Mr Smith provided air back-up for that trip
Paragraph 19
- Returns to the helicopter expert to undermine the men a second time.
- Wisdom of latest adventure was questioned
- Questioned by Günter Endres
- Endres is editor of Jane’s Helicopter Markets and Systems
- Said: I’m surprised they used the R44
- Would not use that helicopter so far over the sea
- Sounds as if they were pushing it to the maximum
- Implies recklessness, though using a craft fully is not exceeding it
Paragraph 20
- Spokesman’s evidence is misframed to suggest the men did not know what they were doing.
- A spokesman said it was not known what had gone wrong
- The flying conditions had been excellent
- Implies mystery rather than mechanical failure beyond their control
Paragraph 21
- Government statement reframed to fuel anti-rich resentment.
- Ministry of Defence said the taxpayer would pick up the bill
- This was normal in rescues in the UK and abroad
- Spokesperson said it was highly unlikely money would be recovered
- Information arranged to imply rich people exploit the working class
Paragraph 22
- Wife’s joke used as final image of the men as schoolboys to be punished.
- Last night the men were heading to a Chilean naval base
- Base was Eduardo Frei
- HMS Endurance was to pick them up there
- Ms Vestey said they had been checked and appeared well
- Said she did not know what would happen on Endurance
- Probably have their bottoms kicked
- And be sent home the long way
What are the 10 best quotes from Explorers or boys messing about??
| Moment, Point and Quote | Analysis |
|---|---|
| What’s happening: Sub-headline of the article. Morris frames the rescue with two loaded words. First impression of the men is set. Point: The writer presents the men as vulnerable and helpless. “Plucked from liferaft” | Emotive Verb “plucked”
|
| What’s happening: Opening paragraph of the article body. Morris reaches back to a previous failed expedition. Sets a pattern of incompetence before any facts arrive. Point: The writer uses an unrelated incident to create a bad first impression of the men. “Their last expedition ended in farce” | Opinion “farce”
|
| What’s happening: Main news event introduced. Morris escalates the language of disaster. Frames the crash as near-death. Point: The writer exaggerates the danger to imply the men were fortunate. “New adventure… almost led to tragedy” | Hyperbole “almost”
|
| What’s happening: Description of the moment of crash and call for help. Morris names the men’s expensive equipment. Wealth surfaces alongside competence. Point: The writer accidentally reveals the men were well-prepared. “Satellite phone… Breitling emergency watch” | Emotive Language “Breitling”
|
| What’s happening: Resentment paragraph. Morris introduces unnamed sources of anger. The cost to taxpayers becomes the article’s heart. Point: The real aim of the article might be to highlight how the rich live by different rules to ordinary people. “Resentment in some quarters… adventure had cost the taxpayers” | Opinion “some quarters”
|
| What’s happening: Third party expert is introduced. Morris uses Endres to question the men. Authority is borrowed from a magazine editor. Point: The writer challenges the men’s experience. “Experts questioned the wisdom of taking a small helicopter” | Opinion “Experts”
|
| What’s happening: Section on the men’s actual record. Morris must include the facts but buries them. Structure works against content. Point: The reporter cleverly uses structure to hide and minimise the impact of the men’s experience. “Both men are experienced adventurers… 70 countries in 15 years” | Opinion “experienced”
|
| What’s happening: Spokesperson’s quoted comment late in the article. The actual conditions of the crash are revealed. Earlier suggestions of bad weather are quietly contradicted. Point: The writer tries to draw readers’ attention away from evidence that supports the men. “Flying conditions had been ‘excellent'” | Fact “excellent”
|
| What’s happening: Antarctic explorer’s comment passed via the wife. Morris turns the comment into a statement of luck. The implied verdict is incompetence. Point: The writer implies the men were so irresponsible that only God could save them. “nothing short of a miracle that they had survived” | Metaphor “Miracle”
|
| What’s happening: Final line of the article. Morris closes with the wife’s joke. The lasting image is of mischievous schoolboys. Point: The writer leaves the audience with a powerful last impression of the men as childish. “they’ll probably have their bottoms kicked” | Emotive Language “bottoms kicked”
|
Vocabulary List
| Word | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Absurd | ridiculous |
| Adventure | exciting or daring journey |
| Amphibious | to be able to live or operate in both water and land |
| Bering Strait | small 13 mile seas passage between Russia and the North America |
| Chilean | Something that is from the country of Chile (in South Africa) |
| Congo | The Democratic Republic of the Congo in central Africa |
| Coordination centre | a building where different services are managed to work together |
| Decipher | to unlock of break a coded message |
| Dispatch | to send something for a purpose |
| Ditch | to abandon something or someone without intending to return |
| Farce | an absurd situation / beyond logic |
| Himalayas | The tallest mountain range in the world in Asia, contains Mount Everest |
| Icebound | to be locked in with frozen ice (‘bound’ means to be tied up) |
| Intercept | to meet and stop something from reaching its destination |
| Ironically/ Irony | when something the exact opposite of expected (and is funny in a dark or cruel way) |
| Maximum | the limit of something |
| Ministry of Defence | A section of the UK government that manages the military and warfare |
| Miracle | an event that cannot be explained by science that is then claimed to be by God |
| Naval | something that belongs to the Navy (the sea based section of the military) |
| Negotiate | to find a way past obstacles (also to discuss a transaction) |
| Plucked | something small being removed from a big area |
| Plunged | jump or dive quickly and energetically; push or thrust quickly |
| RAF | Royal Air Force (the name give to the section of UK military connect to planes and helicopters) |
| Resentment | anger at being treated unfairly |
| Scramble | to climb desperately in a messy way (and slightly out of control) |
| Siberia | eastern part of Russia, famously cold during winter |
| Steaming | (English slang) to move very quickly (like a steam train) |
| Taxpayer | someone who pay tax (a portion of a wage to the government) |
| Tragedy | an event that causes death with great sadness or pain (also a type of play) |
| Uncharted | never been explored before – there is no chart (map) |
| Uncharted waters | sea or ocean that has never been explored before – there is no chart (map) |
| Vessel | a ship |
What is the conclusion on Explorers or boys messing about??
Morris turns a routine rescue into a story about reckless rich men.
He uses loaded words, vague experts and clever paragraph order to do it.
What looked like a thicket of bias is now a tidy map you can use in the exam.
If you want more guides like this, the rest of the Edexcel iGCSE study guides are waiting.
Frequently asked questions
What is the focus of Explorers or boys messing about?
Explorers or boys messing about? is a Guardian news article by Steven Morris.
It reports on two British explorers whose helicopter crashed off Antarctica.
What is the purpose of Explorers or boys messing about?
- Make the men look like reckless schoolboys, not skilled explorers
- Stir taxpayer anger at the cost of the rescue
- Borrow expert authority to question the men’s choices
- Bury the men’s real skill in the middle of the article
- Frame wealth as proof of foolish judgement
What is the message of Explorers or boys messing about?
- Wealthy adventurers behave like irresponsible boys and should not cost the public money.
What are the supporting issues and themes of Explorers or boys messing about?
- Class resentment between the rich and ordinary taxpayers
- Bias and selective reporting in news writing
- Authority and expertise versus lived experience
- Childishness as a stamp put on adult men
- Structure as a tool to hide or highlight facts